Daily Archives: 20/06/11

Huge Marine Drill Confirms Ground Invasion of Libya


Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
June 20, 2011

On Sunday, CNN reported on a huge Marine war exercise dubbed Exercise Mailed Fist.

“The exercise is designed to test the capability of every type of Marine Corps aircraft, including MV-22 Ospreys and F/A 18 Hornets, as well as some Navy ships and Air Force planes,” CNN reported.

The exercise will encompass a large area on the U.S. East Coast – from Quantico Marine Base in northern Virginia to the Navy’s Pinecastle Bombing Range in Florida. Most of the exercise activity will occur above North and South Carolina.

The drill begins today and ends on Friday.

Thousands of Marines will take part. According to CNN, it will be biggest drill of its kind ever held on the East Coast.

“Exercise Mailed Fist is the first exercise of its specific kind and the largest 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing exercise conducted in recent history,” Staff Sgt. Roman J. Yurek, Marine Corps spokesman, told CNN. “In the past, 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing units had to deploy to the West Coast to conduct this type of training.”

It appears the Pentagon has released information about the exercise exclusively to CNN. A Google News Search produces scant results on Exercise Mailed Fist.

CNN is a notorious focal point for Pentagon psyops. In 2000, the Pentagon confirmed that psyops personnel, soldiers and officers, have worked in the CNN headquarters in Atlanta. In February of that year, Dutch journalist, Abe de Vries, reported on the presence of U.S. Army personnel at CNN for the Dutch daily newspaper Trouw.

Obama will visit Fort Drum in New York on Thursday. It is speculated he will announce a decision on drawing down U.S. forces in Afghanistan, but the visit may also be related to a plan to send ground troops into Libya.

The huge military exercise comes at a critical time. As we reported last week, the United States is in the preparatory stages of a ground invasion of Libya and a campaign against Syria.

“Infowars.com has received alarming reports from within the ranks of military stationed at Ft. Hood, Texas confirming plans to initiate a full-scale U.S.-led ground invasion in Libya and deploy troops by October,” Aaron Dykes reported on June 15.

Moreover, the source stated that additional Special Forces will be sent to Libya in July, with the 1st Calvary Division (heavy armor) and III Corps deploying in late October and early November. Initial numbers are estimated at 12,000 active forces and another 15,000 in support, totaling nearly 30,000 troops.

Other calls to the Alex Jones Show from military personnel confirmed the reports

Huntsman’s Utah record will face increased scrutiny


 

Former ambassador to China Jon Huntsman has spent the weeks leading up to his presidential announcement frequently calling his role in the Obama administration as a call to duty.

Still, it may take more than explaining that he worked for a Democratic president for him to secure the Republican nomination.

Today, less than two months after leaving his post in China, Huntsman will officially announce his presidential bid. That will further increase scrutiny of his record as Utah governor from 2004 to 2009, during which he took positions that are at odds with many Republicans on such issues, as climate change, civil unions and the federal government stimulus package .

Huntsman used a speech last month at the University of South Carolina commencement speech to explain why he joined the Obama administration. Huntsman encouraged graduates to serve their country if asked.

“I was, by a president of a different political party,” he said.

Huntsman on the issues

Jon Huntsman not only served as President Obama’s ambassador to China, but also his record as governor of Utah includes positions stands at odds with those of Republicans in Congress and voters influential in GOP primaries. They include:
Climate change: Huntsman backed a program by Western states to limit greenhouse gases considered responsible for climate change through a cap-and-trade plan. Most Republicans oppose the measure as a tax increase and a job killer. Huntsman recently said cap-and-trade did not work and he would not implement any proposal that could hurt job growth.
The 2009 federal stimulus program: As governor, Huntsman accepted federal funds from the $787 billion federal stimulus plan. In late 2008, he said Utah had a variety of projects that cost a total of $14.4 billion. Spending that money on those projects could create 124,000 jobs in Utah, Huntsman said.
However, only three Senate Republicans and none in the House of Representatives voted for the stimulus plan approved by Congress in February 2009.
Civil unions: Huntsman backs civil unions for gay couples, calling it a fairness issue. Social conservatives oppose any moves to expand rights associated with traditional marriage to the gay and lesbian community. Utah state Sen. John Valentine said Huntsman’s record may cause problems in the primaries.
By Jackie Kucinich, Sources: Salt Lake Tribune; ABC News; USA TODAY, Associated Press

While some on the right still question that decision, most are turning to his record as governor of Utah.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah and Huntsman’s 2004 campaign manager, said Huntsman campaigned that year as more conservative than he turned out to be as governor.

“It will be interesting to see what sort of platform he will come up with in his run for the presidency,” Chaffetz said.

In December 2008, Huntsman sought money from what became the federal stimulus plan, which won only three Republican votes in Congress. Huntsman said at the time the money would pay for projects that could create 124,000 jobs in Utah.

Last month, Huntsman told ABC News that he did not regret taking stimulus funds but thought the bill lacked the focus on infrastructure projects and corporate tax cuts that would “improve (the) … economic future.”

The stimulus “was not properly focused around that which would really stimulate the economy,” Huntsman said.

Chris Chocola, a Republican former congressman from Indiana and now head of the conservative Club for Growth, called Huntsman’s willingness to take more government funds and initial comments that more federal funds should be committed to the stimulus a “red flag.”

“He took the money and didn’t even kind of pretend he didn’t want it,” Chocola said. “Regardless of what the stimulus was made up of, thinking you need more of it from the government is not exactly a limited-government view.”

Huntsman’s support for a February 2009 initiative to allow civil unions in Utah, which has a ban on gay marriage in the constitution, also has raised eyebrows among conservatives.

Utah state Sen. John L. Valentine, who led the chamber during Huntsman’s tenure, said Huntsman’s civil unions record “is going to be tough for him in the Republican primaries.”

“He never talked about it, that was sort of after he was clearly on his way out that he made that announcement,” Valentine said.

Huntsman told ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos that he believed in “traditional marriage” but that supporting civil unions was a “fairness issue.”

He also has backed away from some of his previous positions.

As governor, Huntsman sought limits on greenhouse gases through a cap-and-trade plan, which would limit emissions by forcing companies to purchase credits if they exceed a set amount. In May, he told Time he now is focused more on economic growth and that anything such as a cap-and-trade plan that might affect growth is off the table.

“Cap-and-trade ideas aren’t working; it hasn’t worked, and our economy’s in a different place than five years ago,” Huntsman said.

In 2007, Huntsman signed the Western Climate Initiative, a memorandum of understanding among governors from western states to work to combat greenhouse gases. That agreement included a regional cap-and-trade plan.

Chocola said he is glad Huntsman has changed his mind on the cap-and-trade issue and noted Huntsman is not alone.

Former Minnesota governor Tim Pawlenty, another Republican presidential contender, now calls his former support of the plan “a mistake.”

Many conservatives want to see how much of Huntsman’s record as governor carries over to his presidential campaign, said Utah Sen. Mike Lee, a Republican who was Huntsman’s general counsel.

“It is not always the case that the positions that a person takes as governor will necessarily translate directly into their presidential campaign,” Lee said.

Scores of U.S. Strikes in Libya Followed Handoff to NATO


By and
Published: June 20, 2011

WASHINGTON — Since the United States handed control of the air war in Libya to NATO in early April, American warplanes have struck at Libyan air defenses about 60 times, and remotely operated drones have fired missiles at Libyan forces about 30 times, according to military officials.

The most recent strike from a piloted United States aircraft was on Saturday, and the most recent strike from an American drone was on Wednesday, the officials said.

While the Obama administration has regularly acknowledged that American forces have continued to take part in some of the strike sorties, few details about their scope and frequency have been made public.

The unclassified portion of material about Libya that the White House sent to Congress last week, for example, said “American strikes are limited to the suppression of enemy air defense and occasional strikes by unmanned Predator” drones, but included no numbers for such strikes.

The disclosure of such details could add texture to an unfolding debate about the merits of the Obama administration’s legal argument that it does not need Congressional authorization to continue the mission because United States forces are not engaged in “hostilities” within the meaning of the War Powers Resolution.

Under that 1973 law, presidents must end unauthorized deployments 60 days after notifying Congress that they have introduced American forces into actual or imminent hostilities. That deadline for the Libyan mission appeared to pass on May 20, but the administration contended that the deadline did not apply because the United States’ role had not risen to the level of “hostilities,” at least since it handed control of the mission over to NATO.

In support of that argument, the administration has pointed to a series of factors, noting, for example, that most of the strikes have been carried out by allies, while the United States has primarily been playing “non-kinetic” supporting roles like refueling and surveillance. It has also said there is little risk of American casualties because there are no ground troops and Libyan forces have little ability to exchange fire with American aircraft. And it noted that the mission is constrained from escalating by a United Nations Security Council resolution.

The special anti-radar missiles used to suppress enemy air defenses are usually carried by piloted aircraft, not drones, and the Pentagon has regularly said that American military aircraft have continued to conduct these missions. Still, officials have been reluctant to release the exact numbers of strikes.

Under military doctrine, strikes aimed at suppressing air defenses are typically considered to be defensive actions, not offensive. On the other hand, military doctrine also considers the turning on of air-defense radar in a no-fly zone to be a “hostile act.” It is not clear whether any of the Libyan defenses were made targets because they had turned on such radar.

The administration’s legal position prompted internal controversy. Top lawyers at the Justice Department and the Pentagon argued that the United States’ military activities did amount to “hostilities” under the War Powers Resolution, but President Obama sided with top lawyers at the State Department and the White House who contended that they did not cross that threshold.

On Monday, Jay Carney, the White House press secretary, acknowledged the internal debate, but defended the judgment made by Mr. Obama, noting that the applicability of the War Powers Resolution to deployments has repeatedly prompted debate over the years.

The House of Representatives may vote later this week on a proposal to cut off funding for the Libya mission. The proposal is backed by an odd-bedfellows coalition of antiwar liberals and Tea Party Republicans.

They are opposed by an equally unusual alignment of Democrats who support the White House and the intervention in Libya, and more hawkish Republicans.

On Monday, a group that includes prominent neoconservative figures — including Liz Cheney, Robert Kagan, William Kristol and Paul Wolfowitz — sent Republicans an open letter opposing efforts to cut off funds for the mission.

 

Frontier forces quadriplegic man off plane


20 June 2011

FORT COLLINS, Colo. — A quadriplegic Colorado man says he was humiliated after he was forced off a Frontier Airlines plane because a pilot said it wasn’t safe for him to fly.

John Morris and his family were trying to board a flight in Dallas on Sunday to return home to Fort Collins. The 24-year-old Colorado State University student says he has flown Frontier in the past, using an airline seat-belt extension to secure his chest and legs to the seat. But this time the pilot refused to take off.

Frontier spokesman Peter Kowalchuk told KMGH-TV the pilot was concerned for Morris’ safety and uncertain whether the seat-belt extension could be used to restrain his legs and torso.

Kowalchuk says federal rules are unclear on whether the extension can be used to restrain disabled passengers.

Frontier eventually arranged for Morris and his family to take the next flight, and the pilot on that plane had no issues with transporting him

INFOWARS EXCLUSIVE: Military Sources Reveal Ground Force Invasion of Libya


Sit Rep part 1

Sit Rep part 2

Hotel Housing Foreign Journalists Has Guard Shot To Death , Reporters Nervous


 

By
Published: June 20, 2011

TRIPOLI, Libya — Reports that a guard at the hotel housing foreign journalists here had been fatally shot sent a tremor of anxiety through Qaddafi government media operation here on Monday. While Qaddafi loyalists said the guard accidentally shot himself with his own weapon while eating a late dinner at the end of the hotel two days earlier, at least two people working for the government said on condition of anonymity that he was killed by rebel snipers.

The guard had been assigned to protect a prominent state television commentator known for his outspoken attacks on the rebels who has taken refuge with his family inside the safety of the hotel because of death threats against him. The commentator, Yousef Shakeer, said in a brief interview that the government had identified his would-be assassin as a past member of the Libyan Islamist Fighting Group — a jihadist group that dates back years — and he affirmed the government’s account that the guard accidentally shot himself on Saturday night.

While the details of the shooting could not be confirmed, it came amid growing reports of episodes of violence between local rebels challenging the government of Col. Muammar el- Qaddafi and his security forces. Some Tripoli residents said Monday that the sense of danger from the ground is compounding the effect of the escalation of NATO strikes from above.

On Monday, the Qaddafi government made new charges that a NATO airstrike had killed civilians, including children. NATO representatives could not be immediately reached for comment.

The accusation came a day after the alliance admitted for the first time that one of its missiles had accidentally hit a civilian neighborhood and may have killed civilians. Reporters saw five bodies in that case; the Libyan government claimed nine civilians had been killed.

In the latest charges, a government spokesman said a strike 40 miles west of the capital had killed 15 civilians. The site, a palatial country estate and wild game farm, belongs to Khoweildi al-Hamidi, a former military officer and close associate of Colonel Qaddafi who participated in his 1969 coup. It was impossible to determine whether the farm might have served some military function.

Qaddafi officials said a total of eight rockets had destroyed several homes around the farm around 4 a.m. The spokesman, Moussa Ibrahim, said Mr. Hamidi was unharmed but that among the dead were three of his young granddaughters. Government officials took foreign journalists to see the wreckage at the farm and then to a local hospital to show them several bodies, including some charred and blown apart and some belonging to children. Still, their connection to the bombing could not be confirmed.

Speaking at the scene of the strike, Mr. Ibrahim called it proof that NATO was moving toward “deliberately targeting civilians” in order to “break our spirit.”

“Do you think this will finish in one month’s time or two months’ time?” he asked, predicting that memories of the attacks would produce “hateful generation after hateful generation to come in Libya, and those hateful generations will make the world a very dangerous place.”

The tour of the devastated property revealed the lavish lifestyle available to those close to Colonel Qaddafi. According to the photographs and the accounts of journalists who made the trip, the property included at least five large villas; vast stores of pasta and bottled water; at least one large swimming pool; aviaries; and a menagerie including horses, camels, antelope, lamas, ostrich and deer.

NATO says it is continuing to focus its attacks on Colonel Qaddafi’s military and takes great care to avoid civilian casualties. NATO maintains that the objective of its mission is to prevent Colonel Qaddafi from harming Libyans opposed to his rule, but European and American political leaders behind the campaign have said they mean to help the Libyan rebels topple him.

The rebel battles lines remained roughly unmoved Monday around the eastern oil port of Brega, between the midcoast cities of Misurata and Zlitan, and in the Nafusa Mountains in the west.

And residents of Tripoli continued to describe hard-to-confirm bursts of violence in the capital as well. On Friday a Qaddafi soldier in the rebellious neighborhood of Souq al-Juma told a reporter that he feared for his life after a nighttime rebel guerrilla attack had killed a fellow soldier and seriously wounded another. Residents of the same neighborhood later told CNN that Qaddafi forces had killed three people who had tried to protest there on Friday.

On an official trip to a Tripoli university, a student, speaking on condition of anonymity for his protection, said that rebels in his own neighborhood had tried to ambush some police cars but were instead arrested and had their own houses trashed. Another rebel sympathizer relayed reports of clashes on Friday in the rural districts of the Tajura area of greater Tripoli.

A trip on Monday to the western neighborhood of Jansour turned up extensive recently painted-over graffiti — a sign that Qaddafi supporters have been covering up anti-Qaddafi scrawl — and second-hand reports of clashes there as well.

At the same time, some Tripoli residents also say they support Colonel Qaddafi and resent the NATO airstrikes.

But foreign journalists here are largely confined to the Rixos Hotel, usually permitted to travel the city only with official minders, and none of the reports of strife could be debunked or confirmed.

Moises Saman contributed reporting.

Despite the loss of a leg, Army Ranger is back in the fight


Army Ranger Joseph Kapacziewski is back in battle in Afghanistan, as shown in this U.S. Army Special Operations photo from 2009 shows.

20 June 2011

FORT BENNING, Ga. — From the moment his broken body was pulled from an armored vehicle in Iraq — after an enemy grenade, dropped through a hatch, detonated inches away —Army Ranger Joseph Kapacziewski vowed to be back in the fight.

“Is this going to ruin my chances of being a squad leader?” he asked as he was carried into a medical ward.

The soldier’s lower right leg was shattered. Nerve damage left his right arm useless. And from hip to upper thigh, the flesh was shredded by the blast.

It was 2005, and doctors feared Kapacziewski (pronounced Capa-CHESS-ski) would never walk, much less be able to remain in the elite, physically demanding Army Rangers.

Visitors to his hospital room at Walter Reed Army Medical Center heard his vow to rejoin his unit. They nodded, smiled, admired his spunk and didn’t seem to believe a word, says his wife, Kimberley.

But he wasn’t trying to impress.

“I don’t like people telling me I can’t do something,” he says.

Even if it meant choosing in the months ahead to have his leg cut off — so that with a prosthetic he could still jump out of airplanes, rope down from helicopters or fight along 10,000-foot mountain ridges.

Fast-forward five years to the morning of April 19, 2010, to a village in eastern Afghanistan.

With help from his false leg, Sgt. 1st Class Kapacziewski, 28, races down an Afghan road through enemy fire to reach a fellow Ranger who had been shot in the stomach. Along with another soldier, they drag the wounded man 75 yards to safety and administer first aid as insurgents with heavy machine guns try to kill them.

The action earns Kapacziewski an Army commendation medal with a “V” for valor.

The story of Joe Kapacziewski’s rebirth as the only Army Ranger serving in direct combat operations with a prosthetic limb is more than a tale of will power and physical hardship.

It also is the story of a young man with a natural insensitivity to morphine whose screams of pain brought nurses at Walter Reed to tears. It is about a bedridden patient, his leg held together by rods and pins, doing stomach crunches.

It is a story about Kimberly Kapacziewski, 30, agonizing over her husband — already wrecked once by war, yet striving so hard to get back into it.

And it is about a soldier who says his dream is just to be a soldier — and not a war hero-slash-amputee.

Kapacziewski understands the Army’s desire that he tell his story to inspire others, but that hasn’t really set well with him.

“I really worked so hard to be a good soldier,” he told his wife recently. “I’m afraid (now) everyone thinks of me as an amputee.”

A post-9/11 enlistee

The Army’s 75th Ranger Regiment is the only fighting force in the U.S. military that has been continuously in combat since war began after the terror attacks on Sept. 11, 2001. At any given time, one of its three battalions has been in Iraq or Afghanistan.

May 18 marked 3,500 consecutive days of regimental combat operations.

The 3rd Battalion, of which Joseph “Kap” Kapacziewski is one of 12 platoon sergeants, just finished its 15th deployment since 9/11.

Kap was there from the start, enlisting after high school graduation in Bristol, Conn., during the summer of 2001.

After his parents divorced and then his father, who was raising him, died in a car accident when Kap was 12, the boy was raised by a grandmother and step-grandfather.

Several weeks after joining the Rangers he was in Afghanistan and, later, parachuted into Iraq during the 2003 invasion.

Twenty-four hours before leaving on that mission, Kapacziewski met a horse trainer, Kimberly Smithwick, at a sports bar in Columbus, Ga.

When he suddenly vanished overseas for four months, she thought she’d never hear from him again. But he called the day he returned from Iraq and they have been together — except for the demands of war — ever since. They married in July 2005, shortly before he left on his fifth deployment to northern Iraq.

He was ambushed two days before he was to come home.

Insurgents on a highway overpass opened fire with machine guns and tossed down grenades. One fell through the open hatch of a Stryker vehicle, exploding inches from Kap’s right side.

“I remember it all,” he says now.

In a flash, shrapnel blanketed his right side. Nearly every bone in his lower right leg was broken and a major artery cut in his right arm. Two other Rangers were hurt.

Blood gushing from his arm, Kap directed by radio that his vehicle be driven below the underpass, out of the line of fire, and then he alerted others in the convoy to attack.

Only then did he accept medical aid.

For his actions, Kap received a Purple Heart.

Kimberly got a phone call and a trip to Walter Reed.

Enduring the pain

“I didn’t realize that people suffer the way they do,” she says of that time.

She would live with her husband, sleeping in his hospital room, for six months as doctors pieced him back together.

Kap has a natural intolerance to the relief of morphine, Kimberly says. There were times after surgery when his pain ratcheted out of control.

“I just remember him being in there screaming,” she says of one night when doctors and nurses crowded into his room trying to ease his suffering.

“I had nurses coming out to me in the hall telling me if they give him more pain medicine he’s going to die, he’s going to stop breathing,” Kimberly recalls.

For months, doctors thought Kap had lost the use of his right arm because of nerve damage. But then he managed to wiggle a finger, and slowly, much of his sensation and most of strength returned to that limb.

As a consequence, he had Kimberly wheel him down to the hospital’s basement where there is a mock shooting range with a laser-equipped M-4 rifle. For hours every day, Kap would lie behind sandbags and fire the weapon, teaching hands and fingers that had lost feeling how to once again handle a weapon.

But returning to Ranger duty remained an elusive dream. He left Walter Reed with pins and external rods still holding his right leg together.

When the external rods were finally removed and he tried trotting on the leg, he could hear pins holding the ankle bones together snap.

“That was sort of the darkest time,” Kap recalls.

He knew about a small, growing trend in which troops choose to have limbs removed in order to improve mobility with a prosthetic.

After months of internal debate, Kap met with an orthopedic surgeon at a Naval hospital in Portsmouth, Va., and laid out his vision.

“I was like, ‘This is what my plan is. This is want I to do. These are my goals. I would like for you to do it,'” he told the doctor.

In March 2007, his right leg was removed 10 inches below his knee.

The road back to action

Kimberly says she could not oppose Kap going back to war on one leg.

“I think that would destroy him.”

As the months passed and her husband’s strength and mobility improved, his dream became tangible.

“It was something I would talk to my mom and my sister about,” she recalls, “saying, ‘It’s so tough, because this is all he wants. But he’s got to be kidding me. … I think we’ve done our time. I think we’ve done our fair share. I don’t want to get a phone call again.'”

The Rangers were skeptical. No one in Kap’s condition had qualified for a return to direct combat.

There are two other amputees serving in the Rangers, but neither is qualified for direct combat operations.

One of them is Sgt. 1st Class Leroy Arthur Petry, who has been nominated to receive the Medal of Honor after he lost his right hand when he retrieved and threw away a live grenade, saving the lives of other Rangers during 2008 fighting.

In striving to be the first amputee to serve in combat, Kap “had to be able to physically perform to the same standards as other Ranger leaders — he did not get a ‘waiver’ or ‘special consideration,'” says Col. Michael Kurilla, commander of the regiment.

“There was a lot of doubt after he came back,” says Command Sgt. Maj. Eddie Noland, senior enlisted officer for the 3rd Battalion, “whether he could actually go on target and do the things that everybody else was doing.”

But Kap pushed himself and met the standards.

He ran five miles in under 40 minutes and hiked 12 miles with a 40-pound rucksack in three hours. He parachuted from aircraft, initially worrying that wind shear might pull off his false leg.

And he roped down a 50-foot line carrying 60 pounds, learning the hard way that because he can’t slow his descent with one foot and a prosthetic, he needs two pairs of gloves to grip harder with his hands.

“He had that light at the end of the tunnel and he wasn’t going to stop until he got there,” Noland says.

“I guess I’m just stubborn,” Kap says.

Kimberly still recalls the early morning in 2009 — two weeks after the couple’s first son, Wyatt, was born — when Kap left for his first combat deployment with a prosthetic.

As they walked through the darkness across their front lawn, Kap stumbled over a stump and took a hard fall .

The couple, accustomed to saying good-bye, usually keep it brief and unemotional. But seeing her husband on the ground, Kimberly began to cry.

“I was like, ‘This is such a bad idea,'” she says. “I mean are the mountains of Afghanistan the best idea we’ve had?”

‘I’m living the dream’

Kap — now the father of two young boys, Wyatt and Cody, who is 8 months old — just finished his fourth deployment as an amputee a few weeks ago.

Because of a wound by a ricochet bullet early in his career and a more recent shrapnel wound from an enemy grenade during a firefight, Kap now has three Purple Hearts.

“He often jokes that if he is shot in his prosthetic leg he can just change it out. He carries a spare leg with him on missions,” Kurilla says.

Life is more complicated now.

Just getting out of bed to walk is an elaborate process. First there’s a thick neoprene liner that must cover the residual limb. It can be hot and sweaty and prone to causing sores if left on too long. And then there’s the prosthetic and over that, a long, elastic sleeve extending to the thigh.

But the upside is being back with his Rangers, Kap says.

In the field, “there’s a light in him that comes on,” Kimberly says.

He even gets excited packing his bag to leave, she says.

“I’m living the dream,” Kap says. “I feel like I started this war. I want to see it finished out with my buddies, with my friends. We made a commitment.”

Job at the FBI


The FBI had an opening for an assassin.

After all the background checks, interviews and testing were done, there were 3 finalists;

Two men and a woman.

For the final test, the FBI agents took one of

The men to a large metal door and handed

Him a gun.

‘We must know that you will follow your

Instructions no matter what the circumstances.

Inside the room you will find your wife sitting

In a chair .. . . Kill her!!’

The man said, ‘You can’t be serious. I could

Never shoot my wife.’

The agent said, ‘Then you’re not the right man

For this job. Take your wife and go home.’

The second man was given the same instructions.
&nb sp;
He took the gun and went into the room. All was

Quiet for about 5 minutes.

The man came out with tears in his eyes, ‘I tried,

But I can’t kill my wife.’ The agent said, ‘You don’t

Have what it takes. Take your wife and go home.’

Finally, it was the woman’s turn. She was given the

Same instructions, to kill her husband. She took the

Gun and went into the room. Shots were heard, one

After another. They heard screaming, crashing,

Banging on the walls. After a few minutes, all was

Quiet. The door opened slowly and there stood the

Woman, wiping the sweat from her brow.

‘This gun is loaded with blanks’ she said. ‘I had to

Beat him to death with the chair.’

MORAL:

Women are crazy. Don’t mess with them

Ron Whaley
Summerville, Ga
USN/Disabled
We’ll be friends until we are old and senile
And then we will be NEW Friends

Bomb hits French embassy convoy in Baghdad


BAGHDAD: Seven people were wounded on Monday when a French embassy convoy was hit by a make-shift bomb in Baghdad in the second attack on the mission’s vehicles in a month, an embassy official and local police said.

The attack in Baghdad’s al-Mesbah neighbourhood underscored the still shaky security situation in the capital as the last US troops prepare to withdraw by a planned year-end deadline.

Iraqi security sources said seven people were wounded in the attack, but an embassy spokesman said no French diplomatic or security personnel were hurt though one of the convoy’s vehicles was badly damaged.

“We had an attack with an IED (improvised explosive device),” Issa Maraut, the French embassy first consul, said.

A French embassy convoy also was hit by an improvised explosive a month ago, but Maraut said there was no indication the embassy was being specifically targeted.

A Reuters witness said one of the convoy’s vehicles and two other civilian cars were damaged in the blast.

Violence has eased in Iraq since the heights of the sectarian slaughter in 2006-2007, but an al Qaeda-linked Sunni insurgency and rival Shi’ite militia continue daily roadside bombings, mortar attacks and killings.

Iraqi security officials last year arrested 12 suspected members of al-Qaida who they said had planned to set off a car bomb at the French embassy in Baghdad.

France has been on high alert for attacks due to tensions over presence of its troops in Afghanistan and the country’s ban on allowing full-length Islamic veils, which was widely criticised by Muslims abroad as harming their religious freedom.

In April last year, suicide bombers launched coordinated car bomb attacks on the Iranian, Egyptian and German embassies in the Iraqi capital, killing up to 40 people. Eight years after the US invasion, the last American troops are scheduled to leave Iraq at the end of this year. U.S. and Iraqi forces say they expect an increase in attacks as militias try to show they are pressuring Washington to leave.

NATO now admits Libya air strike, says target was military


Jun 21, 2011

BRUSSELS: NATO admitted conducting an air strike in Sorman but insisted the target was of a military nature, reversing course after denying Libyan regime claims of a bombing in the Tripoli suburb.

The military alliance said in a statement that NATO warplanes carried out a precision air strike against a “high-level” command and control node in the Sorman area.

“This strike will greatly degrade Gaddafi regime forces’ ability to carry on their barbaric assault against the Libyan people,” said Canadian Lieutenant General Charles Bouchard, commander of NATO operations in Libya.

“Wherever Gaddafi tries to hide his command and control facilities, we will find them and destroy them,” he said.

A NATO official said the alliance was aware of regime allegations that 15 people, including three children, were killed in the air raid but had no way of verifying them.

Another official said earlier that the alliance had not conducted any air strikes in the Sorman area.